Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco Giants: All-Time Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

San Francisco Giants: All-Time Team
Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions, and this article can never be anything but original research or personal opinion. Colin M. 06:21, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, for reasons stated above. Colin M. 06:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article has no sourcing and thus appears to be a personal opinion of the author. This article could be saved if a reliable source was added showing who selected the team and their credentials. I will vote to delete unless a credible source is shown for the claim. If one is provided, I will vote to keep. Please contact me on my talk page if you have tracked down a source. Capitalistroadster 07:02, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * If it helps any, the players mentioned on the page up for deletion are exactly the starting roster for the 2005 Giants team. Source: Colin M. 07:11, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, very short article with little or no context. --Angr/undefined 07:13, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete due to being listed under false pretenses. Our San Francisco Giants article lists the current roster as well as members of the Hall of Fame and retired numbers which would be the best basis for starting to select a team. Capitalistroadster 07:23, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Thats the current starting lineup not a all time team too easy if Willie Mays not in there than its junky article. --JAranda &#124; yeah 23:42, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete The article as it is isn't what it claims to be, and even if it was fixed, I don't see any way it could be NPOV. Jcb9 21:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.