Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco Stompers FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 04:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

San Francisco Stompers FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Club has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N. — Jkudlick t c s 16:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 16:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 16:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick t c s 16:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I still believe that playing in the 4th tier of US soccer is notable, but the community disagrees, and so I have to go with that. No evidence this club meets GNG either. GiantSnowman 18:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I also believe clubs playing in the fourth tier are notable. GiantSnowman, I don't see a single AfD with a 4–3 outcome in favour of deletion as being community consensus (I hadn't seen that AfD but would have !voted to keep). Number   5  7  12:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I just want to point out that WP:AFD explicitly states that "[c]onsensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments." Stating that the aforementioned AfD was decided on a 4-3 "vote" is incorrect. — Jkudlick t c s 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - This team (unlike the Canadian team that User:GiantSnowman notes above) is eligible to play in the U.S. Open Cup. And it has played in US Open Cup qualification rounds in 2013, 2014, and 2015 thus meeting WP:FOOTYN.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - is this still going? The club has played in USOC qualifying rounds in multiple years, satisfying WP:FOOTYN. SportingFlyer (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Number 57 and 4th tier of US Football is notable ,the club is eligible to play in the U.S. Open Cup and has played in qualification rounds.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.