Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Jose Taiko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  12:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

San Jose Taiko

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While previously deleted for G11, this time the page has been written in a more encyclopedic tone. Unfortunately, there is just not any coverage that I can find. BrigadierG (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts, Japan,  and California. BrigadierG (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * References to published academic work demonstrating the significance of this organization to the art of taiko in North America have been added, as well as national recognition from the NEA for the original managing director and artistic director of the organization. 31N2024 (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to consider new sources added as well as User:Atlantic306's question. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Coverage is in primary or non-RS. I don't find anything beyond them performing at various venues. This also appears PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Has the nominator accessed the book coverage now referenced in the article which boasts of two books having 23 page coverage of this band? Atlantic306 (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.