Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Puerto Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

San Puerto Project

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

The two references are both broken links. The four externally linked sites seem to have been designed by the author of the the wiki page. Also, the article is written in first person and somewhat incoherent. I just don't think it's all that notable, and should be deleted until the author(s) can come up with some solid (non-broken and non-self-authored) sources. Hojimachongtalk con 07:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - the sources are sufficient to verify that it exists, and it makes claims of notability; however, more independent non-trivial sources are needed, as the nominator says. Delete unless improved by end of this AfD. Walton monarchist89 17:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,

DGG 05:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete The only reason I thought this might be real & notable is because of the book Caribbean Cultural Identities--but it is in Google Books, and the term is not found in the book--though I dont have enough experience with G.B. to know its accuracy for this use.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.