Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana Fey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-28 14:31Z 

Sana Fey

 * — (View AfD)

Does not assert notability, sole source is unreliable, contains speculation. Guy (Help!) 12:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable porn actor. Down the -atory with it. Anthony Appleyard 12:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO on at least two counts-- #6: "Performer has been notable or prolific within a specific genre niche. " 106 appearances (including three on television) listed at IMDB. #7 "There is an original film (not a compilation) named after the performer." Private Times Video 485: Santa Fey & KC. Dekkappai 00:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Dekkappai. --David Hain 12:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks reliable independent sources. I am not impressed with 3 fil databases because they lacl editorial oversight. Not very impressed with the guideline WP:PORNBIO as a way to keep articles about nonnotable individuals. Edison 00:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Considering Dekkappai's comment I would still consider this performer NN per WP:PORNBIO, given that the number of films is a dubious criteria, and only one of those films names the performer. A better article would go a long way to changing my mind if somebody comes along to state their intent to update this. skrshawk 01:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Another with the performer's name in title, passing point #7 at WP:PORNBIO: Busty Conquests Of Sana Fey. Dekkappai 18:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:PORNBIO was written with the intent of not having any actors in the area get articles. That fact that someone meets the criteria is notable in and of itself.  Also 'Lacks reliable independent sources' is not a criteria for deletion. Vegaswikian 22:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.