Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanapia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Sanapia

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

microstub article with no assertion of notability, not even a full sentence Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This isn't the best approach to article writing, but Sanapia does indeed have a 1000+ word ANB entry, and is also the subject of an entire book: . Zagal e jo^^^ 08:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Even a cursory Google Scholar search reveals plenty of sources. This is a clean up issue, not a deletion issue. Redfarmer (talk) 10:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.  Snotty Wong   communicate 14:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Click on the Google book search, and you will find many books written about notable Native Americans, all listing this person in it. Don't nominate a one day article just because its short.   D r e a m Focus  02:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Per my expansion and obvious notability and encyclopedic interest.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - has been sufficiently expanded to show notability. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. per great work by Dr. Blofeld. -- &oelig; &trade; 13:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has enough reliable sources to pass GNG. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  10:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.