Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanchez Raful Sicard & Polanco (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, at a gentle andante pace. The Land 17:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Sanchez Raful Sicard & Polanco
This was previously on AfD at Articles for deletion/Sanchez Raful Sicard & Polanco where it was closed speedily in a manner that WP:DRV found to be out-of-process as it did not meet any of the WP:CSD. Returning here to do the job in a more leisurely manner. -Splash talk 00:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. --Bugturd 00:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; looks like advert for non-notable.--ragesoss 02:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If we could actually delete articles that fast without being "out of process," we whouldn't have to nominate the article again. SYCTHOS talk  02:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possible speedy unless it can be verified that this law firm is notable in some way. Potential speedy as non-notable organisation given that a Google search shows 55 hits . No verifiable third party references as per WP:CORP. Capitalistroadster 02:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and God Bless Process. Eusebeus 07:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 13:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 23:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Law firm which fails WP:CORP guidelines. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.