Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanchin ryu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. This is a Secret account 21:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sanchin ryu

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability is not made clear in article. Lots of ghits but not effort made to address issues over the last 8 months. Single entry by author.Peter Rehse 13:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions.   —Peter Rehse 13:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I was originally going with full Delete but then I saw the following edit summary by a third party: I've heard of this and I'm in Australia... author definitely should get more time to work on this article --Blanchardb 14:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes I saw that too - but that was 8 months ago with no changes to even make borderline. I've heard of lots of things too - some are notable some are not.Peter Rehse 14:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless notability can be referenced. If it really is 40ish years old and has multiple schools taught in public school systems, it is probably notable enough for an article, but this assertion must be referenced in secondary sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradford44 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks sourced claims of notability. --Nate1481(t/c) 09:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep well-known style of Karate. JJL 14:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * How do we know that it's well known? How well known is it? How can we assess this with no sources? Give references that support it being notable and I'd change my vote to keep. Bradford44 15:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.