Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanctuary (Skulduggery Pleasant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Cbrown1023   talk   17:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Sanctuary (Skulduggery Pleasant)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article doesn't establish the real-world notability of this original research.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 07:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As a non-notable fictional location that does not meet WP:FICT, as it lacks coverage in secondary sources. Tnxman307 (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's not actually a fictional location, it's a fictional government. I didn't have room in any of the other article relating to Skulduggery Pleasant to elaborate on it properly so I created an article for it. The article will surely grow as more information comes to light and more books are released. I believe nine Skulduggery Pleasant books are planned. I reasoned that if the Ministry of Magic got an article then the Sanctuary should. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 02:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources indicates to me that the article fails to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The book is not yet notable enough that one plot element in it is likely to be notable. When the series succeeds to the extent of Potter or Tolkien, then will be time to write articles like this, for there will be sources. DGG (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well when you put it like that I suppose you're right. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.