Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandalpunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Sandalpunk
Another -punk supposed genre. Like the others, no evidence that this is in actual use or that anyone is consciously considering their works part of this genre. Delete. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no citeable sources and the content is not verifiable. Avogadro94 14:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As much as I like this particular concept, it seems to be even more blatantly original research than the others. --Ccranium 15:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic. NN, UV. - EurekaLott 15:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. Sorry. redfox 15:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, same as the other entries. UltimateXiphias 23:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. rodii 20:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all this punkcruft. We should have listed all of these into a consolidated AfD. Jamie (talk/contribs) 03:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.