Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandbox tree records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Sandbox tree records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable record label. I would have speedy deleted it, but the article has survived for seven years so a week longer to discuss it won't do any harm. I couldn't find reliable sources to indicate any notability for this. Fram (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Delete. No notable signed artists, no chart action, no awards. I can find no independent, reliable mentions (trivial or otherwise) mentions of the label except for the Wikipedia mirrors and content grabbers. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm unable to find coverage in independent reliable sources for this label; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:COMPANY.  Gongshow   talk  17:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete no independent refs. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.