Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Guleria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. There is just about a consensus below to delete, disregarding rationales that don't have a solid basis in policy. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE provides that a rough consensus allows an administrator to close as delete. Per FormalDude, the key argument here (regarding notability) hasn't been answered. Right path forward here is deleting the article per this rough consensus. Daniel (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Sandeep Guleria

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

1) I am not in a position to update and keep tab on this page. 2) I found the defamatory news are linked to this page without even remotely any substance. 3) I do not want to be associated with defamation case or legal complication.

I hope above my statement is accepted and delete this page. Rejimonck (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Rejimonck (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

(Filed by User:FormalDude on nominator's behalf. Request for deletion received via .)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Medicine,  and Himachal Pradesh. –– Formal Dude   (talk)  07:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close Notable subject. Self-request for the sake of mere deletion are considered frivolous.  killer bee    08:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * To be fair, a !vote that just states WP:ITSNOTABLE is also frivolous. It would be helpful if you could explain why the subject is notable. –– Formal Dude  (talk)  10:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not sure what's defamatory about this, he won an award? Doesn't sound all that bad. Rest is basically where he works. Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * What the nom is referring to is this recently removed content. –– Formal Dude  (talk)  04:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, I still don't think that adds much for notability. Perhaps if found guilty, it's all accusations at this point. What we have now is a doctor, winning awards of dubious notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable Worldiswide (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Award might be notable, but what we have are trivial mentions of the individual; I can't find anything beyond what's given here. If the gentleman was involved (or not) in unsavoury operations at the hospital, well that doesn't add to notability unless proven guilty. That could be something, but what we have now is a doctor that won an award. That's fine but without sourcing we can't have an article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * All that I made request.
 * Since am the one who created the page, I hold it important, to delete it.
 * I hope that any author have rights will be respected foremost.
 * I am not into debate on rest of the issues at this stage. Rejimonck (talk) 05:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 20:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV, doesn't look like it meets WP:NBIO. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 17:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.