Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Nanduri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Sandeep Nanduri

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non notable civil servant. Article fails GNG. Shaji issac (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shaji issac (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shaji issac (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete He has taken good initiatives but the coverages are not in-depth to establish notability. We can't have civil servants become notable for simply doing a little more than the job they should do because it's their job! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Reply: I do respect your statement here. But, as per the rules, if a subject meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, it is possible to create an article. Nakshathra Nair (talk) 04:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep : Sandeep Nanduri is a very famous civil servant in Tamil Nadu. There are lots of articles about him on internet. Please do a WP:Before prior nominating an article for AFD. See Ritz Magazine, Indian Masterminds, First post, The Hindu, The news minute, Business Standard and many more. If you want to know more just see this. Nakshathra Nair (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails to meet WP:GNG, the news articles that produced fall under WP:NOTNEWS, as the articles simply report the news. Couple of articles talk about him changing career paths, and his wife. Changing career paths is probably done by everyone at some point of their lives. -- DaxServer (talk) 07:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom Fails to meet WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage. Frigidpolarbear (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: While many of the sources are reliable, they broadly fall under WP:NOTNEWS and lack significant coverage about the subject. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.