Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Parekh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Sandeep Parekh
Probable vanity lacking neutral point of view and notability Cool3 23:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 14:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  dbtfz talk 01:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The infered notability from the article is unverifiable; his name's appeared in the Indian newspapers all of one time. No further sources were supplied. Metta Bubble 23:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep had more than 15 minutes of fame. It needs clean-up more than deletion. --Gurubrahma 16:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, no notability established as of yet. Stifle 18:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Get some cites for the assertions made in the article (that span more than one mention, per Metta Bubble) and I'd color this keep but as it is... Delete, as much as it pains this inclusionist... + +Lar: t/c
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 09:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - his website doesn't gives the impression he's notable. -- infinity 0 17:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.