Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sander Kleinenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep Giggy  UCP 03:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Sander Kleinenberg

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reasons the page should be deleted: WP:VSCA and WP:NPOV. As an aside, Kleinenberg isn't notable enough to be listed in his home country's (NL) edition of Wikipedia. Here on the EN site we have great self-promotion. Iterator12n  Talk  00:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep other wikis don't determine notability, and besides the article is well established enough to prove his nobility, which itself isn't necessarily a factor for articles in wikipedia. BrenDJ 01:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep. Just because he's not on his country's wiki doesn't mean he's not notable. I count quite a few reliable sources here, including an AMG profile -- even if he doesn't meet any other criterion of WP:MUSIC, he does seem to have WP:MUSIC's first criterion ("has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.") nailed. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Changing to vanilla keep per other users' comments. This may become a WP:SNOW-job. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:24, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Very Strong Keep, he is a very well-known DJ. He plays in many clubs throughout Europe and Miami, plenty of references. very notable as a DJ. Callelinea 01:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability doesn't really have anything to do with whether a topic has a Wikipedia article, in English or Dutch. Many non-notable topics have articles, many notable ones don't.  I don't really see any serious NPOV problems with this article, and I don't think deletion would be an appropriate response if there were any.--P4k 01:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. NHRHS2010  Talk  01:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per TPH. This and this and this here indicate that the 3rd parties are writing about him. the_undertow talk  02:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.