Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandhya Sangeet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  18:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Sandhya Sangeet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no meaningful content in this article that isn't covered in the article of the corresponding author. There is no coverage on this apart from what can be found on blogs and bookstores etc. Mopswade (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * If a book by Nobel Prize for Literature winner Rabindranath Tagore doesn't pass WP:NBOOK criterion 5 then I don't know what would. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete pint 5 is being misapplied when it is givien to a one line article that tells us merely that a work exists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The reason this should be kept is the same as for any other stub about a notable topic: so that someone can find it and add content. That's the whole idea of a wiki. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I agree with you. Also, a Google search shows that there is more scope to add content (I have added a link below). Unfortunately most of these are in Bengali, so I may need to expand the articles. --Titodutta (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - While the article currently a stub, it's still a notable work by international renowned author who is also a Nobel Prize winner. BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Satisfies criteria 5 of NBOOK. The author, Rabindranath Tagore won the Nobel Prize for Literature. James500 (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC) This book also satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Further sources in English include, amongst others:              (commentary in introduction by someone else)      (commentary in notes by someone else)   (meta data appears incorrect: he died in 1941 so cannot be editor in 2002)                                (commentary by someone else)                  . James500 (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Non Notable book. Telling us it exists doesn’t do the trick. I’m with on this. Celestina007 (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Notability is decided not by what the article tells us at the moment, but by what sources exist to allow expansion. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It was reviewed in volume 76 of The Calcutta Review (No.156) in 1882. Hard to find a lot of reviews from that long ago but there is that one.  This guy has a lot of work, perhaps just merge this to List of works by Rabindranath Tagore unless more can be written about this.   D r e a m Focus  19:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable book, non-English sources should also be considered. The book has been a subject of several studies also. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 14:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NEXIST, which says that if reliable sources exist, then the article should be kept. WP:ARTN says that notablity is a property of the subject, not the article, even if the article is a stub. I encourage the folks above to add the sources to the article, even if it's just in a "Further reading" section, so that editors who want to improve the article can use them as sources. — Toughpigs (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is a tremendous amount of critical discussion about this work, as with the other current Tagore nominations, so I have to wonder what kind of BEFORE search the nominator did. Mccapra (talk) 15:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NBOOK 5.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:NBOOK, notable author's work.Cedix (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: I have already voted above. Here I am adding a reference that shows it was an acclaimed book. --Titodutta (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.