Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandi Sahman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. If not (though in all likelihood - sent off playing against Vietnam aged 9, eh?) a G3, essentially a G11 of a footballer whose genuine achievements fall short of WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Sandi Sahman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Identical to the version of this article that was deleted via PROD. Still an auobiography where most of the content of the article cannot be verified. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Please can we also salt this, as all the evidence is they'll just create it again. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, fails all criteria. - SanAnMan (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. Clearly not notable Qed237&#160;(talk) 17:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. At first look I thought this page had been PRODded in error, but I was satisfied by the comments on its sources at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football that it should be deleted. Its creator has not engaged in any discussion on talk pages. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as non notable autobiography. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, likely hoax and definitely not notable. GiantSnowman 20:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as per above. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 01:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, salt and consider sanctions for . Obvious self promotion is obvious. Large portion of page copied from self-authored vanity site. International caps not verifiable (and, as per evidence on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football, not possible). Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 08:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete and salt. Has already been deleted by PROD, possibly eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3 as hoax due to "blatant and obvious misinformation" as discussed at WT:FOOTY. C679 10:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.