Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandi Saksena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Sandi Saksena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough reliable sources to meet WP:BASIC Marvellous Spider -Man 06:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Subject gives an impression of notable personality but doesn't stand true when it comes to Google. I'm open to amend my !vote if someone is able to find 1 or 2 more sources similar to this one.  Anup   [Talk]  14:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not seeing any notability here.  The two general references in the article (including the one mentioned by Anup) are largely given over to quotes from the subject.  Neither shows any indication that the authors of the articles did any research beyond talking to the subject herself.  And the one in-line reference is an autobiographical piece.  It just doesn't add up to notability.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 08:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Apart from that those 2 interviews, (primary sources) there is literally nothing else which is available about the subject. Secondary sources are especially required per WP:WHYN for writing an NPOV article, but I don't see any here. The inline reference in the article isn't really a reliable source. Considering the lack of coverage, I am going with a delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unreferenced essay which is not acceptable for a BLP. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete by all means as this is essentially a business job listing in that it goes to large and noticeable specifics about her career yet no actual substance or sources, simply 1 unconvincing source. None of this suggests what we would need in a acceptable article. SwisterTwister   talk  01:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.