Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandilands Junior School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. -Docg 10:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Sandilands Junior School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Probably fails WP:SCHOOL. I know school deletions can be thorny, but this should not be. It's a primary school, and all we know about it from the article are location, dates, principals, and two links. For a primary school, that's insufficient notability. YechielMan 22:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --- RockMFR 22:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - an award winning school. TerriersFan 23:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - ICT work looks notable at present John Warburton 19:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - - The awards are very minor administrative awards. DGG 23:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The ICT work is not notable, as there is no evidence that the school was selected for this work as a result of any specific school policies or activities - that is, this work was not allocated as a result of specific school merit. Prove the contrary and I'd possibly change my view. Notability arises from actions, not from stuff that would have just happened anyway. WMMartin 14:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - the school was selected as a result of its IT award. These awards are rigorously assessed and are not "very minor administrative awards". TerriersFan 18:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WMMartin. Eusebeus 16:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per TerriersFan. --Vsion 04:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * keep please this award winner school is notable yuckfoo 21:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, one major independent source, numerous other soruces with some coverage. Any notability concerns can be solved by merging to a broader article. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.