Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandile Nzuza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Sandile Nzuza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail notability criteria for artists. Basically he's a talented promising young artist not yet out of art college. Some coverage used as cites, but is it sufficient? I doubt it at this point, much as I wish Sandile Nzuza continued success. Mabalu (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article previously speedy-deleted as promotional, contributed from a WP:SPA account. The given references are from a dealership in emerging artists, and an online article which uses the first person. No evidence found that the subject meets the notability criteria at this point. AllyD (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 03:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability doesn't come from a listing by a commercial gallery selling the artist's work, and l see no evidence that he meets WP:ARTIST. Language like claims that his "creative ability and technical genius has been apparent making him stand out from the crowd" indicate that the purpose of this article is promotional. An extensive unreferenced quotation from the artist violates policy. Perhaps some day, this artist will be notable, but not yet.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.