Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Finley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 05:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Sandra Finley

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unreferenced biography of a living person with no indication of notability per WP:GNP or WP:POLITICIAN. I wouldn't object to redirecting to the Green Party of Saskatchewan page. West Eddy (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - The person has received significant coverage in reliable sources; thus the topic passes WP:GNG:
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, this article is no longer existent as an unsourced BLP. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep now that adequate sources have been provided. --Rob (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sources need to be integrated into the article as footnotes for actual content, not merely listed contextlessly under an "additional sources" heading — but their presence does still count toward a keep. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.