Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Fitzpatrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Sandra Fitzpatrick

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable biography, split from White antiracists in western Massachusetts Fightindaman 21:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, Speedy close as bad faith nom I think this is a bad faith nom. Fightindaman split out the bios himself from White antiracists in western Massachusetts (see ), then created separate bio articles for the people listed, and has now moved all of those individual bios to AfD as well. See: Articles for deletion/Diane Beers, Articles for deletion/Andrea Ayvazian, Articles for deletion/Sandra Fitzpatrick, Articles for deletion/Anita Magovern, Articles for deletion/Patricia Ramsey (activist), Articles for deletion/Russ Vernon-Jones. Wl219 22:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: And as I mentioned in another nomination, the split was not my idea. I could have proposed the article for deletion as a whole, but I thought that by splitting them it would allow each to receive its own judgment rather than have to be judged together. Fightindaman 23:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find any evidence of notability. MarkinBoston 01:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete notable neither separately or together. the idea of lumping them together -- under a rather absurd title -- why Western Mass. ? was probably because none of them could stand up on their own. We only do that for families, as far as I'm aware. DGG (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

On the advice of DGG, I will withdraw this entry.Sanlaw33 00:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * comment by the author
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.