Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Nilsson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the subject is not notable. Milowent is not making an actual argument here, and we don't vote.  Sandstein  20:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Sandra Nilsson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable model. Her previous afd was closed as keep mostly because there was an exemption on WP:PORNBIO that would consider any playboy playmate notable. This exemption was thus removed. There's not much written about this lady outside the fact that she was once a playmate. Damiens .rf 19:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - The previous AfD was also kept because she had plenty of coverage in the press as indicated by the Google News findings. Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Wrong. The previous AfD was closed as kept because at the time there were a explict rule on WP:PORNBIO that would deem all playmates as notable. There isn't much talk about google news on that afd. --Damiens .rf 14:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's a hint. Read the 2nd keep from that AfD and then read all of the following keeps agree with it or mention the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article does not meet WP:PORNBIO.--יום יפה (talk) 20:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2008. I don't see enough nontrivial, reliably sourced information to justify an independent article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm missing something - if there were sources in 2010, why aren't those sources adequate now? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Response. Because, since the previous round of Playmate deletion debates, the working consensus on how to handle their articles has changed. Rather than creating brief stubs on each Playmate, sourced mainly from Playboy sources (which have been, frankly, both promotional most of the time and dubious at least some of the time), the practice more recently has been to include short, factual entries in yearly list article, spinning off separate articles when more complete, better-sourced bios can be written. Note how the Playmates for roughly the last year have been treated, since mid-2010 when the previous round of debates resulted in quite a few deletions.I've been similarly converting some of the independent articles from earlier years to redirects lately, when the individual articles have contained little of no encyclopedic information beyond the list articles, and it's been uncontroversial so far. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Pornbio fail, and refs cited in the article are trivial coverage or primary sources. AfD #1 was quite a knee-jerk parade or flawed rationales. Tarc (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per my vote last time which wasn't that long ago. a few editors are fanatic about redirecting this content into year articles, though.--Milowent • talkblp-r  02:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect - fails WP:BIO, per lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.