Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Simonds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 09:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Sandra Simonds

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable writer MurielMary (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. She appears to be an award winning poet and I see published reviews of her books. However I'm not an expert on poetry: perhaps the nominator can expand on their rationale? pburka (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Two published interviews with her. One poetry award from a publisher (doesn't seem to be a notable/significant award). I don't think this is sufficient evidence of "regarded as an important figure" as per the notability guidelines for a writer. MurielMary (talk) 10:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The reviews from the L.A. Review of Books and University of Arizona establish notability as an author. At least her books are notable, and I'd rather have one article about the author than one for each notable work. I'm a keep. pburka (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:BEFORE and WP:CREATIVE. Searches of Google and social media show that her poems are frequently quoted. There are already three substantial reviews from reliable sources in the article. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What are the three substantial reviews from reliable sources? I count two - one from LA Review of Books and one from U of Arizona Poetry Centre. MurielMary (talk) 10:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: A simple search on "Sandra Simonds review" turns up a number of lengthy reviews of her work. The article should be expanded on this basis.--Ipigott (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject's work is notable in my opinion as i read above mentioned comments and did a quick research i agree with the users in the favor of keep PangolinPedia  07:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.