Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra de Helen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Sandra de Helen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Although this is written differently enough from the first version to not qualify for speedy deletion as a recreation of deleted content, it still isn't referenced any better -- right across the board, the referencing here is entirely to primary sources and blog posts, still with no evidence whatsoever of the reliable source coverage that it takes to get over WP:AUTHOR. As always, a writer is not entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she exists, if you have to lean on invalid sourcing to support it -- she must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to pass WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable American writer with sources not passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  15:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.