Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandrine Erdely-Sayo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Sandrine Erdely-Sayo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I removed some namedropping and uncited material from this page, but I realized there are no significant reliable sources at all. Everything is either from her web site or from promotional interviews where she says what she wants to .This article was added in 2006, by an editor who has contributed nothing else. It illustrates the standards we had at the time; it shows the need for WP:AFC, for it wouldn't have gotten past AfC today.  DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 17:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. not enough reliable sources. Alex-h (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked and not finding notabilityJeepday (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and lacking WP:SIGCOV. The two sources do not show notability generally nor as a musician. Assuming everything is true, she's a private school music teacher, which is confirmed by social media apps and Internet searches. Bearian (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability guidelines. Habiliment (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - simply not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.