Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandringham High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 01:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Sandringham High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of the article is not notable, the article contains no indication of notability, and the article has no references and has been tagged as unsourced since 2008. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I would have supported a delete (considering that it doesn't belong to any school district that I could potentially merge it to); however, this school has recently been the subject of financial struggles, an unusual decline in pass rates, and a corruption scandal. Presently, this article covers none of these issues, but I believe that if we can start from scratch, then I foresee that an article about this high school would not be too out of sight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiWarrior9919 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The subject of the article is notable, the references were embedded in the text. I have followed them and added two references. Zimsec is an easyway to judge notability. Care should be taken to differentiate it from the identically named school in joburg. ClemRutter (talk) 10:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not a fan of keeping school articles, but this one does seem to meet GNG. Jerod Lycett (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * comment I was under the impression that all secondary schools both in the United States of North America and the UK were ipso facto notable; why should this not apply to a Zimbabwean school?TheLongTone (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * please see Articles for deletion/Common outcomes. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks.TheLongTone (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * When high school articles first started getting written in 2003, they were typically US high schools that had press coverage, and notablity was never really in quesrion. Few thought about the fact that 17 years later people would be writing articles about high schools in Zimbabwe or India where even showing the schools exists using online sources could be a problem in some cases. But that's not an issue here.--Milowent • hasspoken  20:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage, the RfC was very controversial with a forced consensus by committee that is opposed by many editors, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve: seems to pass WP:GNG, especially in the light of sources raised in this AfD discussion. --Slashme (talk) 10:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notability esablished.--Milowent • hasspoken 20:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.