Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Skansi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Sandro Skansi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PROF. Article created and exclusively maintained by SPA, presumed to be the article subject. Yunshui 雲 水 08:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Dear Yunshui, please consider editing and updating rather than deleting. I think Wikipedia needs people producing content and not deleting content, and I have been addressing issues with this article almost on a daily basis, alone. Two users and a bot have asked for deletion, and yet no one even bothered to read the stub to correct the typos. It is normal for an article to be started by one user and initially modified by that user alone, especially since it is not a hot topic, and I am puzzled why you think this is inappropriate. There are many examples of such articles. If the community takes your initiative, I welcome it, since I am tired of this edit war which Cabayi started. SciFiZg (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * How does a bot suggest deletion of articles? I'm not aware of such a process. -The Gnome (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Notability wise, subject fair and square meets the requirements, however, I still would like more evidence on his topic of work, I am solely saying he passes notability via his merits, but the article needs to improve. || Regards / 12LA 11:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC) struck !vote by block-evading sockpuppet Yunshui 雲 水  10:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree about the need to expand information on subject's work field. -The Gnome (talk) 09:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep on account of satisfying notability criteria. -The Gnome (talk) 09:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources provided are a list of his books, two retail opportunities to buy his books, and a biography of someone sharing his surname. It's the barest squeak above BLPPROD and does nothing to show that anyone, other than him and his publisher, has found him notable. Cabayi (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Greetings. If the subject's "above BKLPPROD" this means it can stay up, even if by the "barest squeak." Or did you mean something else? -The Gnome (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * , it means that the links to his publications prove that he's a real person and clears the very low hurdle for WP:BLPPROD, it does not show that he's in any way notable, nor that he meets any of the established criteria for demonstrating notability. In particular, as an associate professor, he doesn't meet any of the notability standards for academics at WP:NACADEMIC. Cabayi (talk) 05:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation. -The Gnome (talk) 07:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete A humdrum case of failing to meet WP:PROF. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The associate title is neither here nor there; what we need is evidence of scholarly impact. If we could find multiple published reviews on each of his two books we could make a case for WP:AUTHOR, but I found zero. And his Google scholar profile shows only two citations for one publication, very very far from WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.