Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy & Vyjay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Sandy & Vyjay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill travel bloggers don't automatically qualify for Wikipedia articles. &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * delete'. No evidence of notability whatsoever. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources, article seems to be created by the subject. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment A Google search turns up a lot of results for Sandy and Vyjay. Notability, however, is a different issue. &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP is not a publicity platform for travel bloggers. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam by posted by COI accounts. Also not notable. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Absolutely promotional. Even if there was enough information to prove GNG, the article would have to be completly re-written. Even the first sentence "Sandy & Vyjay are a husband and wife couple who have turned their passion into a profession" is unambiguously promotional. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.