Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Grigsby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Sandy Grigsby

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources here don't establish notability. Most sources present aren't reliable or independent, and those that are do not provide significant coverage:
 * LA Times only features one of her photos, no coverage on her
 * The Mercury News is just an interview and more about a website she launched than her
 * The Citizen is just a passing mention
 * The Guardian is also just a passing mention Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 19:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 19:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Technology, Internet, Switzerland,  and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: i agree with the above - i first noticed this article was mostly written like marketing copy, almost certainly written by the subject or an associate, and she doesn't seem particularly notable in any of the sources Locust Valley (talk) 01:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: PR items are all I find, rest of the links are as explained in the nomination. Not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet general notability requirements based on the sources used, or elsewhere- I couldn't find anything better. I couldn't open the Mercury News one but note what has already been highlighted- that it's not about her. Editing84 (talk) 12:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.