Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Point, Victoria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep --Aranda 56) 03:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Sandy Point, Victoria
Not written in encyclopedic form. Should be rewritten at the least, and given a cleanup if this town really exists.  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *   (talk)  03:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Real place near Wilsons Promontory in Victoria. A Google search for "Sandy Point" Victoria gets 181,000 results see Protected for its natural values and also used as a naval training area as HMAS Cerberus is nearby. Capitalistroadster 03:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep If you haven't bothered to see if the place exists, you shouldn't be putting it on AfD. Additionally, cleanup does not belong on AfD. Peyna 04:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup as per Capitalistroadster abakharev 04:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. "if this town really exists" - I'm not sure why you even doubt it. I agree with Peyna. Cnwb 04:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster. Sarah Ewart 04:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster. Don't forget to add an tag; this article has no cited sources. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real place, apparently... no need for deletion, but a mass-clean up will need to be done. (Notorious4life 05:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC))
 * Speedy Keep - we've established that it exists. Close Vfd.  It should have tags to cleanup and perhaps verify, but that shouldn't be a reason for deletion.  Zordrac 07:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. For reasons above, plus the article is really quite good now. --kingboyk 10:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Article cleaned up, expanded and referenced. No change of vote from keep. Capitalistroadster 09:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is actually much more encyclopedic than those uncountable articles on U.S. hamlets that are nothing but lists of demographic minutiae. - Randwicked 10:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Unresearched nomination. Afd is not cleanup. CalJW 10:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Emphatic keep - it didn't/doesn't deserve deletion, just a good cleanup (which it got, thanks to Capitalistroadster). Does this qualify as consensus? B.Wind 10:11, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Well damn! I am sorry, I made a mistake, gee....  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *   (talk)  19:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * BY THE WAY: I underlined where I said cleanup I really didn't research this to see if it existed or not, and for that I am really sorry...however, I did suggest a cleanup, which it needed at the time. Thanks Capitalist Roadster, for cleaning the article up.  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *    (talk)  20:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think anyone meant any of their comments to be directed perosnally towards you, but just at the nomination in general. I apologize if my comment came off as any kind of personal attack, the tone was perhaps a little negative. Peyna 20:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Dude, I know you weren't attacking me. If anything, I feel bad for posting this. :) Smile!  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *    (talk)  22:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please maybe this can be closed now we all agree right Yuckfoo 01:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.