Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Wirth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Sandy Wirth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Exactly four Yahoo hits for this supposed bit actress, and the only reference is to a nonexistent magazine. Utterly non-notable. Closing admin should seriously consider a block or warning of the author,, who has an extensive history of adding articles about bit actors with questionable sourcing to Wikipedia (that is, if he isn't blocked before the end of this AfD). Blueboy96 15:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment &mdash; Your comments regarding this editor are unworthy. It's not as if he were a vandal, and he most certainly does not deserve to be blocked for writing valid articles about real people who did have roles in the listed shows. Please see Civility. &mdash; RJH (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Moderate Keep About 600 Google hits. This AfD seems a little bit pointy to me. GlassCobra 17:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Out of those 600 Ghits, it looks like three (at most) refer to the subject of the article. Blueboy96 17:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * See WP:GOOGLEHITS, 600 is very low anyways for a common name bio Secret 22:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. IMDb lists three very minor roles, two of them uncredited. Clarityfiend 18:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, I must also agree with the comment. Callelinea 18:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:V and WP:BIO, also no reason to attack the creator in this AFD. Secret 22:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Be civil! Jonathan t - c 23:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with comment. Doesn't appear to have much in the way of notability. That said, I looked at the creator's contributions. They appear to be good faith edits by a user with poor English skills, who may not have been told about our notability policy. That's all. To suggest anything else is incivil and in poor form.--Sethacus 00:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - seems not notable. no verifiable reference, the only one listed from a 1956 magazine that cannot be verified... Iamchrisryan 13:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete what 3 movies? No ref. NN.  Tiptopper 20:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.