Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangamo Therapeutics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Sangamo Therapeutics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not much here, fails WP:GNG and the closely related WP:CORP. Edward Rebar is also listed for deletion; either article could conceivably be merged into the other if anything is to be kept.  Uninvited Company 21:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Article reads more like a promotional blurb than anything, and sources are skimpy.TH1980 (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep - This is a publicly traded company with some significant outside coverage, so I think it needs to be kept but significantly improved. It could pass WP:CORP with some better citations. It does read too much like a PR piece. I vote keep, but needs major rework. Skirts89 (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Skirts89. It's a publicly traded company with coverage. PROMO can be dealt with outside of deletion. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Usually, publicly traded companies are covered by analysts whose reports are considered independent and to meet the criteria for establishing notability. Finding those reports can be tricky, especially if they only exist behind a paywall of if you're a customer of the analyst firm. This report from Sinply Wall St and this from Motley Fool are two that in my opinion meet the criteria in WP:NCORP. Other reports exist also so I'm happy this is notable.  HighKing++ 16:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Week keep, as WP:LISTED company and not being terribly promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.