Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangamon's Principle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per consensus. This title, however, will be redirected as a [slightly] plausible search term for the parent. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Sangamon&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Does not meet the notability requirement for fiction-related articles. In addition, includes much more information not directly related to either the subject of the article or the fictional work from which it is derived. Goes on to cite an irrelevant example of the principle not occurring in another of the author's works. This subject merits no more than a one-line mention in the Zodiac page. Juansmith (talk) 22:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 07:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Zodiac (novel), where quoting the principle it is acceptable, but none of the drug table or other uncited comparisons, so we don't need anything from this article. I suppose technically if someone wants to save the table it could fit in the Wikia Annex. --Dhartung | Talk 09:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Smerge exegetical content to Zodiac. The topic is not independently notable, nor does the synthesisized material belong in an encyclopedia, but it is a significant plot device in the novel. Skomorokh  13:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.