Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangeetha Thanapal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes   talk  18:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Sangeetha Thanapal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not really convinced that the subject warrants enough notability to have its own article. From what I'm seeing, they are just someone who writes their own (arguably controversial) political views on social media. Fails WP:GNG.

I'm sure many have come across way more controversial social critics who do not have their own Wikipedia article, so I'm not sure why this should be any different. (In fact it seems like this was only created back in June last year). ShelteredCook (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ShelteredCook (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Mild keep The Straights Times interview and a few others give her notability, but I'm not sure if it's Wikipedia worthy. Oaktree b (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not really convinced that the nominator has interrogated the sources presented in the article at all to prove their assertion that it fails GNG. Also their overall "argument" is textbook WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST and WP:BIAS (and what relevance does the time of creation even have?!) Kingoflettuce (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I've taken a look at the 9 sources in the article. I'm still unsure as to why you felt the need to create an article for this subject? Where's the notability exactly? ShelteredCook (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you want to engage in fallacious & flimsy arguments based on feelings, I'll entertain you... Nuff said Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I removed the AfD from India-related discussions, I see no link to India in the article apart from the ethnicity of the individual. --Soman (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject has been referenced in numerous Singaporean newspapers,The Guardian, ABC Life and The Atlantic. Coining a new term and sparking a discussion about it warrants having a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worlder2020 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.