Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanger and Didele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 05:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Sanger_and_Didele
Seems like an advertisement for a non-notable band. And it doesn't give any information about the actual performers, for that matter-- just their characters. Kinda like writing a Tenacious D article by only mentioning the history of Wonder Boy and Young Nasty Man.


 * I am also nominating their album, Sanger_and_Didele_Live_at_the_Tillesquat_bowl, for deletion, as I also believe it does not meet the notablity criteria. ekedolphin 09:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * STRONG Speedy Delete Let's see... first off, "Sanger and Didele" gets a grand total of eight Google hits. Secondly, the article could be speedily deleted as being complete nonsense. I mean, "Majoring in Mineral Husbandry (with a minor in loansharking)"? "Tillesquat Women’s College of Botany and Hairdressing"? In addition, it could also be speedily deleted for completely failing WP:BAND, as the article does not even attempt to state why these guys are notable. Get rid of this garbage, and do it now. -- Kicking222 21:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, can this be relisted so it gets more speedy deletion votes? (And BTW, I'm not being so forceful on this one out of bad faith; I just hate seeing made-up crap on such an excellent resource.) -- Kicking222 21:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and Delete as nn, and probable hoax. --BillC 22:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete/Delete. Delete/Delete. Delete/Delete. Per Deletionista, even though he/she/it's not involved in this debate. M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DVD+ R/W 00:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, for failing WP:MUSIC, and for violating Guide to writing better articles (covering the fictional aspects of the band without discussing their real biography). --Metropolitan90 02:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Dideledelete. Fagstein 22:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Tawker 05:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.