Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanghamitra Bharali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Sanghamitra Bharali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:POLITICIAN, I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to support notability. She hit the headlines in 2001 because of her alleged secret liaison with two-time Assam Chief Minister and spent 4 years in jail. There is nothing much to support her musical career. The AfC submission was also declined on 2 September 2016. GSS (talk) 07:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 07:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 07:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 07:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Discussion
Thanks for the correction on the article which i made, But i would like to correct few of the things mentioned by gss-1987 about Sanghamitra Bharali's notability.

1. She was sentenced for 4 years of jail but she got Bail within few months

2. She is a well Known Artist with songs released Globally on Big Online Music Platforms like Gaana.com, Apple Music , Saavn ,Shazam etc.

3. Digital Artist Presence like official Facebook fan page and official website.

thus i think that this article does not meets the Deletion criteria on the lack of notability ! Thanks Worldnpeace (talk) 08:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: She fails WP:NMUS and WP:NPOL. But there are some coverage that may suggest GNG. These coverage broadly deals with her claim to have secretly engaged or married with former Assam Chief Minister Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, and her being held guilty in a misappropriated asset case. Sources: Outlook India, The Sunday India, The Telegraph, Times of India, Times of India-2, for more click here here. I'm undecided as of now and may or may not !vote later. Anup   [Talk]  18:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * True she fails WP:NMUS and WP:NPOL but the sources you provided above talked about her in 2001 and there is no media talk about her between 2001 and 2013 again in 2013 she hits some news at the time she was released from the jail and I can not find anything here about her. GSS (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it should be this link; that one was for another afd subject.


 * There are some coverage (substantial ones) which were published in between 2001 and 2013 contrary to your opinion (See, The Sunday Indian and The Telegraph, linked in previous comment) . Anyway, I believe that WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE thing is applicable to subjects dealing with "event" only, not bio or any other. The only concern here for me is, WP:BIO1E. I need some time to go through many of accessible sources to formulate an opinion.  Anup   [Talk]  07:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, she is only notable for one event and I saw the above link which only covers WP:BIO1E and I personally think it's not enough for a stand alone article. GSS (talk) 08:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete-Seems non-notable and evokes a light response from various media outlets at sudden spans of time! Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 16:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject appears to be some sort of legislative clerk or translator, which is run of the mill staff. The sources about music are not reliable. Bearian (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.