Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sani Flush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Majorly 21:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Sani Flush

 * — (View AfD)

Is there ever really going to be anything encyclopedic to note about this product? - DeleteAsstBot (on behalf of IP: 81.174.157.135) 10:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Reckitt Benckiser. Nothing of value in this article. Bubba HoTep 12:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of the products on the Reckitt Benckiser article have passable stubs, some even have quite long articles. I wonder why someone never bothered to expand this (and only this) one? Bubba hotep 08:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Well known product sold for decades. 86,000 Google hits. I believe this article could be improved. Edison 20:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Edison. --TeaDrinker 20:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. In answer to the nom, yes, there is, and it asserts it just fine.  --Dennisthe2 00:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Granted, the article needs a bit of work.... --Dennisthe2 00:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Edison, this article has potential, and lots of good articles start out like this, per WP:AfD  •The RSJ•    Talk  |  Sign Here  01:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, lots of articles start this way. This article started this way 8 months ago and hasn't been touched since.-- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 06:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.