Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Pandey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 23:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Sanjay Pandey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have reviewed the references cited and they all (including Merinews, which encourageas readers to "Be a Citizen Journalist") appear to be blog contributions and the like with no bona fide news sources. Searching a few Indian newspaper archives for both "Bundelkhand and Pandey" and "Ekikrit" identified nothing related. The citations that are not online do not purport to be about the individual. . .and since the PTI one claims to have been carried by "Hindustan", I searched the archive at "The Hindustan Times" and "The Hindu" and drew nothing (not sure that these are what was meant). I think it's fair to say that a political party that isn't mentioned AT ALL in these major newspapers is not notable, Bongomatic (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * keep,Sanjay Pandey can be searched in many search engines and different news papers of India in respect of Bundelkhand state so the before deleting the article think for a moment —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambabudixit (talk • contribs) 14:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * keep,Sanjay Pandey is a much popular name in politics of Bundelkhand so this article should be considered fully notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyansinghparihar (talk • contribs) 14:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note to the closing admin, there appears to be several sock-puppets taking part in this AfD. See WP:Suspected sock puppets/Chitrabharadwaj Bongomatic (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable politician. His movement, Bundelkhand ekikrit party, is also being considered for deletion. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless actual reliable sources are found: the sockpupetry and dishonest claims about sources make this unlikely. If none found, he seems non-notable, forming a party that has never done anything isn't special.Yobmod (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.