Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Shah (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Opinion is split as to how WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME should apply in this case. Deryck C. 17:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Sanjay Shah (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME. I did find a couple sources Chicago Tribune, WSJ that talk about him, but not seeing enough on to pass GNG, apart from the Danish coverage on the same event. Article contains numerous POV issues as well. Based on talk, editor recreated this page. Jppcap (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 19:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as there's hardly much to suggest even minimally general notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - As I argued on the talk-page, a person who is suspected of frauding 0.5 % of a country’s GDP should be considered notable. Please note that though he is only a suspect, he most likely will never be convicted in a trial due to the lack of extradition agreements. There are plenty of Danish sources. Gloegg~enwiki (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:BLPCRIME. This is a biography of one investigation. This is a criminal biography where the alleged crime is not yet proven. The limited likelihood of a trial does not change this. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep He was already notable enough to support an article before the fraud investigation.  Just for the heck of it, I checked, and sure enough, Bernie Madoff (like Shah a financier/philanthropist of long-standing notability) only got an article on Dec. 11, 2008.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per . Parsley Man (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - As usual, I would appreciate if this were relisted again for better attention. SwisterTwister   talk  05:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.