Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjeev Arora (physician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Sanjeev Arora (physician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing enough independent coverage to support notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep as clear satisfaction of WP:PROF, with which we judge and base these articles; to quote, "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education"; any concerns, by far, are trivial. SwisterTwister   talk  23:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- in addition to the PROF SNG, GNG is also likely met and the subject's many accomplishments check out. See for example:
 * Project ECHO® (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a technology-enabled collaborative learning model originally developed by Sanjeev Arora, a physician at the University of New Mexico, to train primary care clinicians in rural communities to treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. (link).
 * K.e.coffman (talk) 03:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - He's a distinguished professor, which WP:SCHOLAR specifically lists as something that puts individuals over the notability threshold. Not much more to discuss... Fyddlestix (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.