Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of One Piece characters. This was brought here because a single person opposed a merge. That should be discussed on the talk page, not here. Mgm|(talk) 09:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Sanji

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article, about a fictional character, does not satisfy WP:N or WP:FICT. The only sources are non-independent. A merge discussion about several related characters was held at Talk:List of One Piece characters. The result of the discussion in case of this page was declared to be "merge into List of One Piece characters" and the merge executed. The result of the merge discussion was contested by. -- Goodraise (talk) 07:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the WikiProject Deletion sorting/Anime and manga.   -- Goodraise (talk) 07:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Reopen merge discussion - Not sure why you put this up as an AfD. This is obviously a merge discussion, not a delete discussion, so just reopen the merge discussion again at the talk page. Reading the talk page, there was really no consensus, since only there were only two participants. Not sure where this "4 day to improve article" deadline came from either, nor do I agree with it. I think what is needed here is patience for people to voice their oppinions. -- Highwind 888, the Fuko Master  07:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Most participants voiced their opinions in the "General" section a little bit further down. The discussion had stalled. Everything seemed to have been said, even though the discussion was advertised on the project's talk page. Also the deadline wasn't a deadline, merely a "Okay, this is how I summarize the discussion, if nobody disagrees by either speaking up or by improving the article, I'll take that as silent consent." Another reason why I put this up here is because I followed the example of a previous merge discussion that was contested. -- Goodraise (talk) 07:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Reopen merge discussion: It does seem like there was not too much participation in the earlier discussion, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't stand just because one person opposed it (with some very bad faith). As long as they don't cite policy reasons to revert the redirect, it can be reinstated without going through any hoops. - Mgm|(talk) 09:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  04:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.