Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjiv Bhatt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 22:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Sanjiv Bhatt

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject is an Indian policeman who has recently been arrested in connection with allegations going back to the Gujat riots in 2002. Otherwise wholly non-notable. One event and recent news, but not otherwise encyclopedic. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 *  Keep - For me personally WP:RS has more importance than WP:GNG because WP:GNG is completely based on the former.Undoubtedly this article has many reliable sources from newspapers.It does not fall under WP:NOTNEWS because the guideline says "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events" and the news regarding this person is being constantly covered in reliable sources. e.g
 * 1) Sanjiv Bhatt likely to be charged with murder on 10 dec 2011.
 * 2) High Court reserves order on Sanjiv Bhatt plea on 14 dec 2011. Now WP:1E says--"the degree of significance of the event itself and the degree of significance of the individual's role within it should be considered. The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person. However, as both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles become justified".The notability of this person is justified by a simple example that the person's name is written in the heading of the news article, which says that the person notable enough to warrant a full fledged newspaper report.Thus I believe this article should be kept. Vivekananda De  --tAlK 12:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 21:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep – Topic passes WP:GNG, per the availability of reliable sources that address the topic in detail. Additionally, this topic has received ongoing coverage. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sanjeev Bhatt is now an important person in the long standing Gujarat riots case. Please note that though his arrest may be one event, his involvement in the case is likely not to be 1E, as the media says that he is a key figure in the whole case. The riots and the following case is not 1E, and this should be kept per WP:GNG.  Lynch 7  17:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. — Ed! (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Keep Jeevanjoseph1974 (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)]]