Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjoy Paul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Sanjoy Paul

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not pass WP:GNG. WP:REFBOMB. Kadı   Message   22:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, India,  and United States of America.  Kadı    Message   22:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: look like WP:REFBOMB. nd fails in WP:GNG Worldiswide (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This Bell Labs scientist meets the criteria of WP:NPROF, which also applies to research scientists in industry, since he was elected a Fellow of the IEEE in 2004 for "contributions to the design and development of communication network protocols"., it helps in these cases to look at the history of the article. It is now in poor shape due to August changes by an IP editor. this version is much better and I would suggest reverting to it and improving it from there. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. As StarryGrandma writes, meets WP:PROF as Fellow of the IEEE. Citation profile looks healthy too . Also agree that reverting to the pre-IP version would be an improvement. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per the IEEE Fellow and WP:PROF, which explicitly cites IEEE Fellow as an example of something that passes that criterion. He also passes #C1 with plenty of highly-cited publications . Per the discussion above, I have reverted to the suggested version (except for keeping the AfD notice in place). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF and  WP:PROF which he both passes. --hroest 15:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep A classic pass of WP:PROF, which would be enough by itself, and WP:PROF is also met. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.