Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjukta Parashar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Sanjukta Parashar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non Notable mid level police official in an Indian state Uncletomwood (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She is head of police for a district with 2 million people, this seems notable to me.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment John, I kindly request you to please have a reading of how the Indian bureaucracy and police systems work. A Superintendent or even a Deputy Inspector General of Police or for that matter even an ADG of Police does not show any sort of notability if not provided with clear references to substantiate notability. As Necrothesp, just commented, she's just an SP. Uncletomwood (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. She's just a superintendent. That's equivalent to a field-grade officer in the army. Far too junior for any inherent notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is classic BLP1E along with incorrect claims. 2 of the articles cited, apparently claim that she is the "first female IPS officer in Assam". I decided to look further and found this HuffingtonPost article  which clearly says the claims were incorrect (and that makes me actually question the reliability of the former 2 sources). Without this claim, I see this as BLP1E - a flurry of news items about an otherwise low profile individual but nothing that proved the person is notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that IndiaToday is not in general reliable  DGG ( talk ) 14:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.