Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanngto Aika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Ekabhishektalk 02:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Sanngto Aika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CRYSTALBALL. Also film is non-notable by definition (or lack of). 22:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: Actually, and to be clear... WP:CRYSTALBALL is not "failed", as that policy specifically allows that a future event may be written of if properly sourced... and just a little research finds this film topic spoken of in numerous independent sources. All that needs be done is this stub be expanded per multiple available sources {IE: WP:GNG is met)... but it may fail WP:NFF. However, if it can be confirmed that filming has begun, WP:NFF (paragraph 3) would be met and this brand new article merited. That applicable policy indicates that at the very least, it can be spoken of in the article on its notable director, Satish Rajwade. Back in a while.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Director:
 * Writer:
 * WP:INDAFD: Sanngto Aika Satish Rajwade Parag Kulkarni
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: Hi  Schmidt,  Michael Q., how are you keeping lad? Yip, thanks and they are fair points, but I still don't think it is notable, even though it's panning out to be a good film, looking at the script. Looking at the article for more than half an hour yesterday found that - Four of the sources are defunct, with the rest duplicating content, the film looks minor in nature (if only perceived), i.e. the this is the first film for director (having been actor/writer in others), the producer has only been on the go since 2010, Landmarc Films (I see has been going since 19th August 2011, with only 2 well known actors/actresses, all the rest unknowns. scope_creep talk  16:03 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Scope_creep... the guidelines for notability are different concepts than the policy requiring verifiability and the policy allowing inclusion somewhere of sourcable material. Looking beyond the article's perceived failings, the topic of this film IS verifiable, and may (or may not) be considered worth an article if filming is confirmed. My point was to clarify that it is incorrect of you to declare that a policy which allows sourcable content to be written of somewhere was somehow "failed" simply because a separate article might not (yet) be merited.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand. A fine point of policy, which means my afd assertion is no longer a tautology (logic), meaning it's no longer valid, except for a very tiny policy, which may make it pass wp:afd. I would like to leave it in, as it stands, and let the WP community decide. But, if you genuinely believe it passes WP:GNG, then I'll take out the WP:AFD. scope_creep talk 23:57  24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Scope_creep... To be fair, it might have been a valid nomination of the two-sentence stub you nominated under a claim that the film may not meet WP:NF or its subsection WP:NFF. A simple  strikethrough  of the statement's first two words about policy would be reasonable and not effect discussion. Such are the risks when nominating brand new articles on improvable topics (See WP:BEFORE). Just sayin'.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Alternative spelling (drop the extra 'n'):
 * Director:
 * Writer:
 * WP:INDAFD: Sangto Aika


 * Keep and allow continued work on this brand new article. The stub first nominated, is now far different. We have enough sources speaking toward the production and its ongoing filming to meet the criteria of WP:NFF (paragraph3).. Policy and guideline are met.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.