Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanoma Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Sanoma. Nakon 03:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sanoma Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This disambiguation page currently serves no purpose. It should lead to Sanoma daughters, however, none of these has its own article. Only the Russia link isn't red, yet it leads back to Sanoma. gidonb (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

*Keep, the htree redlinks now clearly meet MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION (that wasn't clear for them before you nominated this). It now has 4 valid entries. There may be a valid argument for a WP:RM if the Russian one is definitely the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, but this is a valid dab, unless I've missed something, for example that they are all really the one company? Boleyn (talk) 11:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Delete per 's comments below. Boleyn (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Boleyn Yes, these are daughters of one central company. In the media industry and other industries that were impacted by the internet, we have a huge problem keeping company files up to date because of the quick changes. This disambiguization page basically invites users to build an article for every daughter company, potentially taking our quality further down. Validating this page, while well-intended, does not foster Wikipedia. gidonb (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to Sanoma; term is short enough that it might be searched for via cut-n-paste. Pax 01:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sanoma. I agree with Gidonb's comments, but I wouldn't delete it completely because Sanoma is a media company, and so a redirect there makes sense. Tavix | Talk  01:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.