Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Claus Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus (1 delete, 2 keep, 3 merge}.  Rob e  rt  23:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Santa Claus Camp
Delete. It don't make no sense to me. &mdash; Fingers-of-Pyrex 03:26, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge It is another Boy Scout article about a camp. Merge them all into Philmont Scout Ranch under the List of Trail Camps section Joaquin Murietta 10:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment probably needs someone to update that article to remove all of the red links that are behind these articles. Vegaswikian 06:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * MergeNonsense, and it is just taking up space. Stu 19:28, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * There has been some editing to the entry, but it continues to lack in many ways. I continue to think that it needs to either be merged into a larger article, or deleted. Stu 22:20, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep - clearly not nonsense, and space is completely a non-issue; see Articles for deletion/Rich Cabins Camp for further reasoning. &mdash; Dan | Talk 02:38, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Joaquin - as all the others should be, too (and that seems to be where their vote is heading). Grutness...  wha?  02:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I went to Philmont so I may be biased but these should be kept. Here's why: more than 700,000 Scouts and leaders have backpacked through Philmont since 1938. These camps are familar to many people. With some additional work, the articles could be useful. I tried merging them into a Camps of Philmont article but if quality information is added to each subheading, that article will be enormous. The information could be valuable but the only way to share it is to keep all the individual articles.--L1AM 10:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.