Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santangelo field


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Santangelo field

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is unpublished, uncited new material, with just one arxiv article and nothing in Google Books or Google Scholar. DVdm (talk) 12:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Note - see also article (and subject) creator's comment on my talk page:. - DVdm (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * delete per nomination. Pure OR, and Wikipedia is not the place to promote your unpublished original research.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 04:00, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete since this violated the policy against original research in Wikipedia, but maybe restore it later if refereed secondary sources appear. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Pure OR and the arXiv paper is not likely to be published in any respected journal. Theory is likely to be vacuous as no examples are given to show otherwise (but this is not Wikipedia's concern).--Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow delete, original research/blatant self promotion.Smmurphy(Talk) 00:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.