Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santiam Junction, Oregon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Canterbury Tail  talk  01:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Santiam Junction, Oregon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It's a road and railway junction. The community may well prove me wrong but I cannot see how a simple road and rail junction is notable for inclusion. It'd need to be pretty significant. The article says it is the site of the National Register of Historic Places-listed Oregon Pacific Railroad Linear Historic District, which be taht as it may is referring to a large area of track and land, not to a particular railway and road junction. Canterbury Tail  talk  21:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Towns/villages are inherently notable regardless of size. And this one has its own National Register of Historic Places-listed district.  And I've never seen a community that has it's own airport up for AfD before. --Oakshade (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Oakshade. --Kevin Murray (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep What they said. Communities are inherently notable; this one even has its own airport. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm inclined to keep this as a notable landmark, but I can't find evidence it was ever an inhabited community; and the "airport" is basically an emergency landing strip often used for mountain rescues. The significant use of the site, aside from as a regional landmark for driving/hiking directions, is as a highway maintenance facility. As such it may be best merged with the airport, which is marginally notable. --Dhartung | Talk 22:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * keep please listing in the national register of historic places makes is very important too yuckfoo (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Okay I misread it. I didn't actually realise it was also a town. That is my mistake and my problem. It didn't state that it was a community as well when I started the notability thing on it and didn't pay enough attention to the subsequent edits. Previously it only said it was a road and rail junction. I withdraw the nomination. Canterbury Tail   talk  01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.